Legal Opinion
Persaud v. New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*768OPINION OF THE COURT
Alice Schlesinger, J.
Plaintiff Brian Persaud has moved by order to show cause to compel defendants to accept his supplemental bill of particulars, dated October 11, 2007, which spells out his demand for punitive damages. Defendants vigorously oppose the motion, claiming that it is untimely and prejudicial and procedurally improper. For the reasons stated below, this court finds that defendants’ objections, when viewed in the context of these proceedings, do not bar the requested relief.
Background Facts
Plaintiff Brian Persaud, a construction worker in his early thirties,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- McCaskey, Davies & Associates, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Home Insurance v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Prozeralik v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aragona v. Allstate InsuranceNew York District Court · 2013
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. SultanNew York Supreme Court · 2014