Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Hoke

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certified Questions from Circuit Court, Greenbrier County. Bill by Sallie Lockliart and others against Jerome A. Hoke, administrator, etc. Demurrer to bill sustained, and questions arising thereon certified.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, President:

A demurrer to the plaintiff’s bilbwas sustained, apparently on the ground of multifariousness, and the questions arising thereon are certified to this Court for decision.-

The suit is brought by Sallie Lockhart and her six illegitimate children, whose ages range from forty-three down to twenty-one years, against the administrator and the legitimate children and heirs at law of James H. Hoke, deceased. The bill is framed in a double aspect and prays for relief in the alternative and for this reason apparently the court hold it to be multifarious and sustained the demurrer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zell Guano Co. v. HeatherlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Beverlin v. BeverlinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Moore v. HarperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Shafer v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Cecil v. KarnesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kester v. KesterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. ShaidWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Brecker v. BreckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Goodykoontz v. White Star Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API