Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 21, 2002No. 01-02-00253-CRPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.

Appellant, Ollie Thompson, III, challenges the convicting court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. In his sole point of error, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion because he established by a preponderance of the evidence that he would not have been prosecuted or convicted if exculpatory results had been obtained through DNA testing of the state’s trial evidence. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

On December 8, 1995, a jury found appellant guilty of the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rivera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Kutzner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  2. Baggett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. Fry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Murphy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API