Legal Opinion

Wickersham v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1984No. 5780PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is a consolidation of six appeals arising under the Alaska Limited Entry Act, AS 16.43.010-16.43.990. 1 All six appellants filed untimely applications to the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission [hereinafter “CFEC” or “Commission”] for entry permits into either the Prince William Sound or Cook Inlet drift gill net fisheries. One of the appellants, Leroy Clendenen, was an Isakson applicant, meaning that he held a gear license for the first time in 1973 or 1974 and, therefore, had to file an application by September 30,1977 with a 30 day…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Swanner v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Matter of K.L.J.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Brandon v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hickel v. HalfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Jerrel v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API