Wickersham v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is a consolidation of six appeals arising under the Alaska Limited Entry Act, AS 16.43.010-16.43.990. 1 All six appellants filed untimely applications to the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission [hereinafter “CFEC” or “Commission”] for entry permits into either the Prince William Sound or Cook Inlet drift gill net fisheries. One of the appellants, Leroy Clendenen, was an Isakson applicant, meaning that he held a gear license for the first time in 1973 or 1974 and, therefore, had to file an application by September 30,1977 with a 30 day…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Swanner v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of K.L.J.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Brandon v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Hickel v. HalfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Jerrel v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.