Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. City of Somers Point
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 14, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
281 N.J. Super. 492 (1994)
658 A.2d 1276
F. WILLIAM MITCHELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF SOMERS POINT AND DIANE R. HESLEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 8, 1994.
Decided March 14, 1994.
Before Judges BROCHIN and KLEINER.
Harry Haushalter argued the cause for appellant (Conley & Haushalter, attorneys; Mr. Haushalter, on the brief).
James F. Ferguson argued the cause for respondent City of Somers Point (Roger C. Steedle, attorney; Mr. Ferguson, on the brief).
Keith A. Szendrey argued the cause for respondent Diane R. Hesley (Todd & Gemmel,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Sokolay v. EdlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Clinton Tp. Citizen's Comm. v. Clinton Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Horner v. TP. COMMITTEE OF TP. OCEANNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Arace v. IrvingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Casamasino v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Little Egg Harbor Tp. v. BonsangueNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Willoughby v. Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Hirth v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Greenwich TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.