Legal Opinion

Burden v. Zant

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 19, 1991No. 90-5796PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner argues that the Court of Appeals, in rejecting his conflict-of-interest claim, improperly failed to give a pre sumption of correctness to a state-court factual finding, in violation of 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d). We agree, and accordingly the motion for leave to proceed informa pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

On August 1, 1981, petitioner was arrested on a charge of burglarizing his sister’s house. Kenneth Kondritzer, a local public defender in a two-attorney public defender’s office, was appointed soon thereafter to represent petitioner. While petitioner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Jimmie Burden, Jr. v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Jimmie Burden, Jr. v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Burden v. ZantDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1988

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Shillinger v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. McClain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Devier v. ZantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Anderson v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API