Legal Opinion

Park Corporation v. City of Brook Park, Unpublished Decision (5-9-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2002No. 79410Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} This case is an appeal from an order of Judge David T. Matia ruling that Brook Park Codified Ordinance Chapter ("BP.C.O.Ch.") 709 was a valid, constitutional excise tax levied on the gross receipts of appellants I-X Center Corporation ("I-X Corp.") and its parent, Park Corporation ("Park"), from parking fees at the International Exposition Center ("I-X Center"). They claim the tax is arbitrary and discriminatory and without rational basis. We reverse.

{¶ 2} Park is a Nevada corporation licensed to do business in Ohio, and I-X Corp. is an Ohio corporation and a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API