Legal Opinion

Nason v. Patten

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1913No. 17,876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Stevens district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

This action was brought by the vendee in a contract for the sale of land to enforce specific performance and for damages, and was tried as an action to recover damages only. Judgment was given for the amount of an advance payment.

No conflict appears in the evidence. No default in *473the contract had been made by the vendor before the suit was brought, but- he .had conveyed the land to another who had purchased it in good faith. To sustain the judgment it must be presumed that the recovery was allowed upon the theory that the contract had been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mastin v. GrimesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Phelps v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Earls v. EarlsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Roberts v. YawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. Hillyard v. BanchorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Malmberg v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Knipe v. TroikaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Leidigh & Havens Lumber Co. v. WyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Wensler v. TilkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Bentley v. KeeganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API