Bates v. Lane
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
■Campbell, C. J.
Bates recovered judgment below for *134certain moneys which it was found had been paid to defendant’s use, at his request, by Bates, who was his partner for certain purposes, in which defendant was to make all the cash outlays. The amounts included in the judgment were certain outlays for supplies and stock to be used in the lumbering business of the parties; certain advances on defendant’s request not connected with the business; a balance of interest on the purchase price of the land, which defendant was to pay for, and did pay for, except for this deficiency overlooked ; and a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kinney v. RobisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nicholes v. HuntOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Davidor v. BradfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Clapp v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Halleck v. StreeterNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Loan Association v. . FerrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.