Legal Opinion

Call v. O'Harrow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Russell, J.) EjeotmeNt. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Call brought ejectment against O’Harrow for a strip of land about 12 feet wide, being a part of lot 10 in block 13, according to Newell’s enlarged and corrected plat, in the city of Muskegon. Plea, general issue, with notice that the strip claimed adjoined lot 9, with which it had been enclosed by a fence understood to be on the line between the two lots by the owners and occupants thereof for more than 20 years before suit brought, and that defendant had had the peaceable, uninterrupted possession, occupancy and use of the strip claimed, cultivating it and growing fruit-trees thereon in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Price v. HopkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. Ten HoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Walker v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Escher v. BenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Gould v. FieroMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API