Legal Opinion

PRIME ENERGY AND CHEMICAL, LLC v. TUCKER ARENSBERG, P.C.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00345Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PRIME ENERGY AND : CHEMICAL, LLC, : Plaintiff : No. 2:18-cv-00345 : v. : (Judge Kane) : TUCKER ARENSBERG, P.C., et al., : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Presently before the Court is Defendants Tucker Arensberg, P.C., Michael A. Shiner, and Kenneth L. Carroll, III’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 51) Plaintiff Prime Energy and Chemical, LLC (“Plaintiff”)’s second amended complaint (Doc. No. 50) in part.1 For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background2 Plaintiff is a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API