Legal Opinion

Bell v. Federal Kemper Insurance

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided September 1, 1988No. Civ. A. 2:87-1302PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court is the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and the Plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment. The parties have submitted memoranda in support of their motions and the matter is mature for this Court’s consideration. The issues before the Court concern matters of law and are as follows:

1. Whether the Defendant, Federal Kemper Insurance Company, is entitled to assert its subrogation claim against Plaintiff, Patricia Bell, where Plaintiff previously filed, and subsequently settled, an action against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Travelers Indemnity Company v. RaderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Klacik v. KovacsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. United Pacific Insurance v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Complete Health, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Federal Kemper Insurance v. ArnoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Thompson v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1992
  5. Principal Casualty Insurance Co. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API