Schreiber v. Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentNesbitt, Judge
I am disturbed by the ambiguous scope of review announced by Judge Schwartz for granting rehearings en banc as well as its application to the present controversy.4
It is clear that Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.331, authorizing en banc proceedings, is procedural in nature rather than a grant of substantive authority. State Farm Mutual Automobile Co. v. Judges, 405 So.2d 980 (Fla.1981). Notwithstanding a possible constitutional infirmity in the en banc rule due to Article V, Section 4(a) of the Florida Constitution, which provides: “Three judges shall consider each case and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nielsen v. City of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Sapp v. WarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- In Re Rule 9.331, Etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Hagan v. Sabal Palms, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Hull v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.