Legal Opinion
Chace, Sr. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 23, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C. J.
— In this ease plaintiff in error sued defendant in error on a contract for purchase and sale of real estate. The contract was made a part of the declaration. The phraseology of the contract was like that involved in the case of Chace vs. Johnson, 98 Fla. 118, 123 Sou. 519.
Demurrer was interposed to the declaration. Demurrer was sustained and thereupon judgment entered in favor of the defendant against the plaintiff.
The declaration in the case now before us is in all material respects identical with the declaration in the case of Chace vs. Johnson, supra. That declaration was held good…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. NewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Taylor v. RawlinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Chace v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tucker v. Dr. P. Phillips Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Carman v. GunnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Harbeson v. Jackson Land Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962