Boyd v. Barrenger
Mississippi Supreme Court
In error from the circuit court of La Fayette county; Hon. Hugh R. Miller, judge. The opinion of the court contains a sufficient statement of the facts of the case.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice FisheR
This was an action of debt, brought to the October term, 1846, of the circuit court of La Fayette county, upon a decree rendered at the December term, 1838, of the supreme court of the state of Tennessee, against William R. Cox, the defendant’s intestate.
The only point important to be noticed, arises upon the defendant’s fifth plea, which avers, that the suit was not commenced within three years after the rendition of the decree sued on, and that the said William R. Cox was at the time of the rendition of said decree a citizen of this state. To this plea the plaintiffs replied, that the said…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. FallonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
- Estate of Miller v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- Furlong v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
- Bridgforth v. PayneMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
- Downey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.