Legal Opinion
Citizens for Tax Reform v. Deters
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 27, 2006No. 1:05-cv-212PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 29), the State of Ohio’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 33), Defendant Joseph T. Deters’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 32), and Defendant Mathias H. Heck, Jr.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 34). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs’ Motion, Deters’ Motion, and Heck’s Motion are GRANTED, and the State of Ohio’s Motion is DENIED.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Ohio Revised Code (“O.R.C.”) § 3599.111 (“the Statute”) states in relevant part as follows:
(B) No person…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meyer v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Person v. New York State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizens for Tax Reform v. DetersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Citizens for Tax v. DetersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Opinion No. (2007), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2007