Legal Opinion · Dissent

Updike v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1910No. 16,014Published

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Abraham L. Sutton, Judge.

1DissentRoot, J.

I am unable to concur in the majority opinion. The courts are not in accord concerning the principle controlling the liability of a municipal corporation for personal injuries inflicted by reason of its defective streets. In City of Omaha v. Olmstead, 5 Neb. 446, we held that the city, in accepting its charter and the privileges therein bestowed, by implication promised the state to perform the duties thereby cast upon» the municipality, and individuals injured by the city’s failure to keep its promise had a right of action against the city. “The acceptance of these privileges is considered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. MacMullen v. . City of MiddletownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Stoppert v. NierleNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. O'Harra v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Rankin v. BuckmanOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Tewksbury v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API