State v. Hebner
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge..
Mary Hebner was convicted, after a jury trial, of drawing an insufficient funds check in excess of $50.00. I.C. § 18-3106(b). On appeal she raises two issues. She contends that an instruction given by the court to the jury impermissibly shifted the burden of proof — concerning fraudulent intent — from the state to her as the defendant. Also, she contends there was not a sufficient foundation laid to introduce into evidence other checks drawn against her account, in addition to the one for which she was on trial. Although we find no error on the evidentiary issue, we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BarkerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
- State v. SteeleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020