Legal Opinion

Botkin v. Kickapoo, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 20, 1973No. 46,529PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This is an action in replevin and for damages growing out of the purchase of feed mill equipment. Trial to the court resulted in judgment for defendants from which plaintiffs have appealed.

Upon issues framed by the pleadings the trial court ruled plaintiffs had abandoned the property which was the subject of the suit and further that their claim for relief was barred by the statute of limitations and by the statute of frauds.

Plaintiffs were partners engaged in the grain business at Argonia, Kansas. Their spokesman and actor in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. CrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. Storm v. Barbara Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. Kimberlin v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Chapman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Moore v. HayterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Williams Telecommunications Co. v. GraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Prue v. Royer, Sr., and Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. Mason v. SchumacherNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Davis v. OdellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API