Legal Opinion

Superior Beverage Co. v. Schieffelin & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 24, 2006No. 05-3698, 05-3787, 05-3854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

Schieffelin & Co., an alcohol distributor, appeals two orders from the district court, in which that court abstained from exercising jurisdiction based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Thibodaux, 360 U.S. 25, 79 S.Ct. 1070, 3 L.Ed.2d 1058 (1959). Superior Beverage has cross-appealed on the same issue. The district court based its decision on the fact that the litigation is alcohol-related; it determined that Ohio has a complex regulatory scheme dealing with the distribution of alcohol, and that the Twenty-first…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Superior Beverage Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Schieffelin & Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Goodman Beverage Co., Inc. v. Schieffelin & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Armentrout v. Atlantic Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010
  3. Miller, Brent L. v. Ameritech CorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Toni 1 Trust v. WackerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. First Response Metering, LLC v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API