Legal Opinion · Dissent

Publicity Providers Inc. v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 24, 1980No. 79-T-114, CA 17949Published

1DissentThornton, J.

The majority holds without any discussion that a group of salespersons who sell commercial advertising specialties such as ball point pens, calendars, decals, etc., for Publicity Providers, Inc., on a commission basis are not employes within the meaning of the Unemployment Compensation Law.

I cannot agree. This case is clearly distinguishable on the facts from Pam’s Carpet Service v. Employment Div., 46 Or App 675, 613 P2d 52, rev den 289 Or 677 (1980), which the majority cites as the sole authority for its holding.

Contrary to the majority, I find that the evidence in the record in the case at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Pam's Carpet Service, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Republic Development Co. v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Revlon Services, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Greater Portland Newcomers Service, Inc. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API