Legal Opinion

Christopher Calise, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 8, 2026No. 4:21-cv-06186Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHRISTOPHER CALISE, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06186-JSW 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 v. CERTIFY ORDER FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL 13 META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 71 Defendant. 14 15 16 Now before the Court is the motion to certify an order for interlocutory appeal filed by 17 Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”). The Court finds the motion suitable for decision 18 without oral argument and HEREBY VACATES the hearing set for February 6, 2026. The Court 19 has considered the parties’ papers,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Ray B. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Atel Financial Corp., a California Corporation v. Quaker Coal Company, a Kentucky CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API