Legal Opinion

Mile Wide Copper Co. v. Piper

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1925No. Civil No. 2233PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— J. P. Piper, P. W. Eockstraw, George T. Eichards, Wayne McKee and Alice A. Trill, hereinafter called plaintiffs, filed this suit in the superior court of Pima county, against Charles P. Eeiniger, hereinafter called defendant, and the Mile Wide Copper Company, a corporation, hereinafter called the company. The complaint sets up the following allegations in substance:

About January 21st, 1916, defendant, in pursuance of a plan which he had previously formed to secure options on certain mining claims and to organize and promote a corporation for the purpose of selling and transferring said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Hughes v. Cadena De Cobre Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Frame v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hays v. Georgian Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Jeffs v. Utah Power & Light Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  3. Davis v. DunseathArizona Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API