Hughes v. Cadena De Cobre Mining Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for Pima County. John H. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKent, C. J.
The alleged error of the trial court in denying the motion to strike certain portions of the amended complaint will first be considered. The complaint alleged, in substance, the existence of the plaintiff as an Arizona corporation, and the residence of the defendants in the territory of Arizona; that at the time of the execution and adoption of the articles of incorporation the plaintiff corporation had no assets or property whatsoever; that on December 29, 1904, the several defendants, excepting the defendant William O’Neil, agreed among themselves to organize the corporation, and were the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hayward v. LessonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ruth v. RhodesArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Clark v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- First Baptist Church v. ConnorArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Frame v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Hoover v. OdleArizona Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.