Legal Opinion
United States v. Schenck
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 31, 1941Published
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
Alfred C. Blumenthal, through his attorneys, now moves for an order recalling my decision dated July 16, 1941, denying his previous motion to set aside an order of the Honorable Grover C. Moscowitz dated March 11, 1941, and a subpoena issued thereunder directed to Mr. Blumenthal, and why the United States Attorney should not be restrained from instituting and prosecuting any proceedings to have the moving party adjudged guilty of contempt. The ground upon which this motion is based is that the original motion to set aside the order and subpoena had been decided by Judge…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boatmen's Bank v. FritzlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. CuneoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Taylor v. Decatur Mineral & Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1901
- Potts v. Village of HaverstrawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In re MarkowitzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.