Legal Opinion

United States v. Washington

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 21, 1995No. ACM 30804PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Judge:

Members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of six specifications of accepting or soliciting bribes or graft totaling over $70,000 (in violation of Article 134, UCMJ1), one specification of impersonating an agent of superior authority (also a violation of Article 134), two specifications of extortion (in violation of Article 127, UCMJ2), four specifications of larceny of currency, property of the United States, totaling over $20,000 (in violation of Article 121, UCMJ3), two specifications of violating Air Force Regulation 30-30 by soliciting or…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. Smith, JrCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  3. United States v. CombsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. Combs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. United States v. SimoyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API