Legal Opinion

Kevin Tucker & Associates, Inc. v. Scott & Ritter, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 18, 1992No. 91-CA-2204-MRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This case is a dispute between the City of Bowling Green (hereinafter “City”), an architectural firm (hereinafter “Tucker”), and a building contractor (hereinafter “Scott & Ritter”) over the faulty construction of a golf course. The City had separate con tracts with each of the other parties; Scott & Ritter’s contract had an arbitration clause, Tucker’s contract did not. The City sued Tucker alleging both negligence and breach of contract; Tucker filed a third-party complaint against Scott & Ritter alleging that any damages were the contractor's fault. At issue here is whether…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown Hotel Co. v. Pittsburgh Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  2. Floyd v. Carlisle Const. Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Dix & Associates Pipeline Contractors, Inc. v. KeyKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Crime Fighters Patrol v. HilesKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Prudential Life Insurance Co. v. MoodyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Presnell Construction Managers, Inc. v. EH Construction, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Degener v. Hall Contracting Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Superior Steel, Inc. v. Ascent at Roebling's Bridge, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Adam v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API