Legal Opinion
DIAZ
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1975No. ID 2443PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2443 MATTER OF DIAZ In Exclusion Proceedings A-17145706 • 'Decided by Board October 28, 1975 (1) Since a permanent resident alien commuter does not make a Fleuti-type departure . each time he returns to his place of residence from his place of employment in the United States ? applicant, an alien commuter, was not returning after a Fleuti-type absence at the time of her application for readmission on January 7, 1974, and the lawfulness of her original entry for permanent residence may be examined in exclusion proceedings. (Matter of Maldonado-Sandoval, 14 T. & N. Dec. 475…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Saxbe v. BustosSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Reid v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ponciano Maldonado-Sandoval v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Josue Castro-Guerrero v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SANCHEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
- Ying Suet Chow, AKA Monica Chow v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981