Legal Opinion

Munyan v. French

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On contract. On demurrer to plea.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief Justice.

The following facts give rise to the problem to be solved:

The two defendants, French and Fox, executed a joint money bond to the plaintiff, and while this instrument was outstanding French, becoming insolvent, made a statutory assignment for the benefit of his creditors, and that the plaintiff duly made claim thereunder by virtue of the bond in question.

The present action is against both defendants, founded on this instrument. The declaration is in the ordinary form, *19alleging a joint obligation in both obligors to pay the money…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kulp v. RickettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Pacific Mortgage Co. v. KrewsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API