Legal Opinion

Steadfast Insurance v. Agricultural Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2012No. 10-5113Published

1Opinion of the Court

CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW

DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellee Steadfast Insurance Co. (“Steadfast”) issued successive insur-*684anee policies to the Grand River Dam Authority (“GRDA”), providing GRDA with first-level excess general liability coverage from 1993 through 2002. Steadfast defended GRDA against a number of flooding claims made during this time period. Although the flooding at issue spanned the entire nine-year period of coverage, Steadfast and GRDA agreed that the amounts Steadfast paid on those claims would be allocated to a single Steadfast policy, the 1993-94…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Keck, Mahin & Cate v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Pino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Niemeyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API