Steadfast Insurance v. Agricultural Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW
DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellee Steadfast Insurance Co. (“Steadfast”) issued successive insur-*684anee policies to the Grand River Dam Authority (“GRDA”), providing GRDA with first-level excess general liability coverage from 1993 through 2002. Steadfast defended GRDA against a number of flooding claims made during this time period. Although the flooding at issue spanned the entire nine-year period of coverage, Steadfast and GRDA agreed that the amounts Steadfast paid on those claims would be allocated to a single Steadfast policy, the 1993-94…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Keck, Mahin & Cate v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Pino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Niemeyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.