Legal Opinion
Berkelhammer v. Whitehall Pharmacal Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 9, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
The plaintiff has moved to transfer the above-entitled action to the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island pursuant to Section 1404(a) of Title 28 U.S.C.A.
The complaint in this action alleges that (1) plaintiff resides and is domiciled in the State of Rhode Island; (2) the defendant is a manufacturer of pharmaceutical products; and (3) a bottle of one of these products, to wit, • *72Freezone, was sold to the plaintiff in a drugstore in Rhode Island. Neither the advertisements nor the instructions on the bottle, it is claimed, warned the plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Compania De Astral, S. A. v. Boston Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Peebles v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1932
- Keppel v. E. W. Wiggins Airways, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1952
- Elgin Laboratories, Inc. v. Utility Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1939
- Pagnotti v. Alan Wood Steel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dahlberg Company v. American Sound Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1959
- Bunker v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
- Camp v. Lebanon Fabrics Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960