BP America Production Co. v. Madsen
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶1] The Third Judicial District Court has presented two certified questions concerning the jurisdictional provision contained in the Wyoming Royalty Payment Act (the WRPA), which is found at Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 30-5-803(b) (LexisNexis 2001). We conclude that the WRPA does not confer exclusive jurisdiction over claims brought under it in the district court for the county in which a particular well is located; rather, the intent of the WRPA is to allow such claims to be brought in the district court of any county in which a well is located.
FACTS
[¶2] The appellees are the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Brooks v. ZabkaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Lindley v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Chavira v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Moncrief v. HarveyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Yellowbird v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Crosby-Edwards v. Ohio Board of Embalmers & Funeral DirectorsOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- EOG Resources, Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Cherokee Nation Businesses, LLC; And Arkansas Racing Commission v. Gulfside Casino PartnershipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.