Legal Opinion

Bartnik v. Erie Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from trial term, Kings county. Action by John Bartnik, an infant, by Francis Gottsberger, his guardian ad litem, against the Erie Railroad Company. • From a judgment for plaintiff-, and an order denying a new trial, defendant ap: peals.

1Opinion of the CourtCullen, J.

The plaintiff entered into the ferry house of defendant for the purpose of crossing from Jersey City to New York. As the boat from New York came into the slip, the gates in the ferry house were raised, and passengers were allowed to go on the bridge. To avoid the throng of persons who were coming from the boat, the plaintiff stepped to the side of the gangway for foot passengers, and stood in front of the wheel that is used in fastening the boat to the bridge. While there, a link in a chain which supports in part the weight of the bridge broke, and a rod to which it was attached fell ■on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Stierle v. . Union Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Jones v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Hogan v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Stierle v. . Union Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Bartnik v. Erie R. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Huebner v. HammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API