Legal Opinion

Durbin v. Woods

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1975No. 30095PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal by certificate from an order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The suit is for specific performance and damages.

The record does not show beyond doubt that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim which would entitle him to relief. Ammons v.Bolick, 233 Ga. 324 (2) (210 SE2d 796); Almaroad v. Giles, 230 Ga. 473 (197 SE2d 706). Also, a review of the record shows genuine issues of material fact to be resolved. Therefore, the trial court was correct in denying the motion for summary judgment. Davis v. Dickson, 232 Ga. 338 (206 SE2d 473).

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ammons v. BolickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Davis v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Almaroad v. GilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marathon U. S. Realties, Inc. v. KalbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Rhyne v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Thomas v. McGeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Bedgood v. Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API