Legal Opinion

Almaroad v. Giles

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1973No. 27764PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawes, Justice.

1. "Since the adoption of the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, p. 609; 1967, p. 226; Code Ann. Title 81A) a complaint need not set forth a cause of action in order to withstand a motion to dismiss but need only to set forth a claim for relief. Under that title, the complaint may no longer be construed most strongly against the pleader. 'Furthermore, "a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim should not be granted unless it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff would be entitled to no relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of his claim. If,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Calvary Independent Baptist Church v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Mitchell v. DickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. Koehler v. MassellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Bond v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Gaines v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Rivermist Homeowners Assn.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Coppedge v. Columbus, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Stith v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Durbin v. WoodsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Clifton v. BerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API