Legal Opinion

In re Hest

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2003No. 01-BG-663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This matter came before the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) as a result of discipline imposed upon Bruce H. Hest (“Respondent”) by the Supreme Court of Florida,1 for ethical misconduct warranting such sanction from the Florida Bar.2

Bar Counsel, upon review of the Respondent’s Florida disciplinary record, recommended that reciprocal discipline be imposed and that the Respondent be disbarred in the District of Columbia. On October 31, 2002, the Board determined that reciprocal discipline in the form of disbarment should be imposed and recommended that the Respondent be disbarred.

R…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In re DubowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In Re ShoreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re LaibstainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API