Legal Opinion
O'HEARN v. Bodyonics, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 23, 1999No. CV 98-1168(ADS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This motion to punish the defendants for civil contempt for concededly violating Court orders, raises the issue of whether the defendants have been “reasonably diligent and energetic” in attempting to comply with the orders.
The plaintiffs commenced this diversity based breach of contract action on February 17, 1998. The lawsuit is grounded on two written contracts between the defendants, Bodyonics, Inc., Great Earth Companies, Inc. and Phoenix Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, “Bodyonics” or the “defendants”), and the plaintiffs, Michael…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stephen King v. Allied Vision, Ltd. And Innovation Books, a Division of the Innovation Corporation, New Line Cinema CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Rosen v. SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Colonial Exchange Limited Partnership v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- O'HEARN v. Bodyonics, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Schmitz v. St. Regis Paper Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matrix Essentials v. Quality King Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004