Lankford v. Holton
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR. REHEARING.
Jenkins, Justice.
1. The defendants in error, plaintiffs in the trial court and the intervenors claiming under her, contend in their motion for rehearing that this court “failed to take into consideration circumstances cinconsistent with the testimony/” of the witness as to the usury, “which the special [examiner] in hearing and examining the testimony produced at the hearing considered *109in discrediting the testimony” of the witness. It is observed that the record fails to show any such contention before the examiner, the trial judge, or in this court in the original…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Jones v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Thompson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Rome Railroad v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Armstrong v. BallewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.