Armstrong v. Ballew
Supreme Court of Georgia
Levy and claim. Before Judge Fite. Gordon superior court. October 3, 1902.
1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.
From the bill of exceptions and the record in this case it appears that two claim cases, in which J. M. Ballew was the plaintiff, L. D. Armstrong the defendant in fi. fa., and Mrs. M. S. Armstrong the claimant, were, by consent of the parties, consolidated simply to the extent of trying them together. In one of these cases, in which the execution in favor of Ballew and against L. D. Armstrong had been levied upon a mule and a yoke of oxen, the property was found subject; and upon the claimant’s motion for a new trial being overruled, she excepted. Upon the trial, the claimant admitted that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Amis v. CameronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Erwin v. EnnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Wells v. Coker Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Laramore v. MinishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Penny v. VincentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Neill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Detwiler v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Lewis v. PattersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- McRae v. WilbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.