Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank v. Smaagaard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1934No. 29,957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEYANEY, Chief Justice.

Conversion for the alleged Avrongful taking and detention of certain personal property. The facts are stipulated. The H. A. Stratte Company was, at the time of the commencement of this action, the owner of a tract of farm land upon which plaintiff held a real estate mortgage. One Nelson tenanted the tract from the H. A. Stratte Company under a Avritten lease which entitled the lessor to one-lialf the crops grown thereon during the period of the lease and to a certain amount of cash as rental. The lease further reserved to the lessor title to all the crops to be groAvn…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merrill v. ResslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Camp v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  3. Huitink v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Foss v. DullamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Ash Creek State Bank v. ZwartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spratt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  2. Killmer v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Lawin v. PepeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API