Legal Opinion

AMERICAN MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Copeland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 20, 1966No. 41899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. The burden is upon him who attacks the validity of a marriage to show that it is invalid, by clear, distinct, positive and satisfactory proof. See Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Harris, 68 Ga. App. 889, 891 (2) (24 SE2d 803); Brown v. Parks, 173 Ga. 228 (1) (160 SE 238); Norman v. Goode, 113 Ga. 121 (38 SE 317). “Where a party to a ceremonial marriage has been previously married and the validity of the second marriage is challenged, a presumption arises that the second marriage is valid until evidence is adduced that the spouse of the first marriage is living, and only then does…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. ParksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Norman v. GoodeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Zurich Insurance Co. v. CraftCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Uddyback v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API