Legal Opinion

White v. Rukes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1916No. 6479PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Canadian County; John J. Carney-, Judge. Action by Frances M. Rukes against Ó. C. White. Judgment for .plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This action was commenced by the defendant in error, Frances M. Rukes, against the plaintiff in error, .0. C. White, in the district court of Canadian county, to recover damages alleged to be due the plaintiff by reason of the defendant negligently running his automobile over a horse belonging to plaintiff. The facts, briefly stated, are as follows: Two minor sons of the plaintiff were riding horseback along a public highway, they going toward the north, when they saw the defendant approaching in his automobile coming toward the south. The road at this point had been graded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. OrnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Indiana Springs Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. House v. CramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. SnipesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Schulkey v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. McKinney v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Transport Indemnity Company v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API