Legal Opinion

United States v. Ryan

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2000No. 2:99-cv-00504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRODY, District Judge.

Jemel Steward Ryan was indicted for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which prohibits a convicted felon from possessing firearms. Ryan moved to suppress: (1) evidence of a firearm and ammunition that police seized from a station wagon in which he had been riding, and (2) a statement he gave to police detectives. 1 On September 25, 2000, I held a suppression hearing.

FINDINGS OF FACT

On March 7,1999, at approximately 5 p.m., Police Sergeant Joseph Gindele was patrolling the 19th police district of Philadelphia. Gindele was in police uniform and his police…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Christopher v. NestlerodeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Christopher v. NestlerodeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Eaton Corporation v. GeisenbergerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
  4. SIMS v. PENN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API