Legal Opinion

People v. Natal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. Defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel under the standards adopted by this court (see, e.g., People v Morris, 64 NY2d 803, affg 100 AD2d 630; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137) and reaffirmed in People v Satterfield (66 NY2d 796 [decided herewith]).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Simons.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. FantroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. People v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API