People v. Morris
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed (see, 100 AD2d 630).
We agree with the majority at the Appellate Division that viewing the totality of the circumstances defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of *805counsel under the standards adopted by this court (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Aiken, 45 NY2d 394; People v Droz, 39 NY2d 457). We would but add that defense counsel’s alleged prejudicial concession in summation that the physical lineup which he had attended was fair, was made in the context of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. DrozNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. AikenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by67 opinions
- People v. CartagenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. CarolinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. BairdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. BoeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.