Legal Opinion
Mogg v. Armstrong
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 1965No. 1421PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
In the companion appeal rendered this date, Peterson v. Armstrong, 176 So.2d 453, all issues of this appeal have been decided except the plaintiff’s prayer for an increase in the award, and the defendants’ request for a reduction therein.
The plaintiff lost four teeth as a result of the accident, as a result of which she underwent oral surgery -and was fitted with an upper plate, with attendant discomfort in use. She suffered a laceration in her mouth requiring 25 sutures to close, and also had bruises and contusions all about her person. She retained a tiny scar on her leg which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Peterson v. ArmstrongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peterson v. ArmstrongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Miller v. WeaverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Smith v. New York Fire & Marine UnderwritersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Runfalo v. MeynardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Jenkins v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.