Runfalo v. Meynard
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, Judge.
This case arises from an intersectional automobile collision and involves two consolidated suits against the defendant-appellant, Allen P. Meynard. One suit was by Frank Runfalo for medical expenses and *600collision insurance deductible for himself and for personal injuries and loss of wages on behalf of his minor son, and the other suit was by Runfalo’s subrogated collision insurance carrier for auto damages in excess of the deductible.
Meynard answered both suits, denying his negligence and alternatively alleging contributory negligence. In the first suit he reconvened against…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Youngblood v. RobisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Bourgeois v. FrancoisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Bryant v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Ballaron v. RothLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Naquin v. Van CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garrison v. State, Through Dept. of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Robertson v. StaubLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971