Legal Opinion

State v. Fahina

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 7, 2017No. 20151000-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POHLMAN, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant Paula Tuitavuki Fahina appeals his conviction for aggravated assault involving domestic violence, a third degree felony. Fahina argues that the trial court erred in admitting testimony at trial under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Fahina and Victim met while she was residing at an extended stay hotel in South Salt Lake City. They began a sexual relationship that lasted for about a month and a half, during which time Fahina would stay overnight in Victim’s room three or four nights a week. Fahina also kept some…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. PinderUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HackfordUtah Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Leland SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API