State v. Fahina
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POHLMAN, Judge:
¶ 1 Defendant Paula Tuitavuki Fahina appeals his conviction for aggravated assault involving domestic violence, a third degree felony. Fahina argues that the trial court erred in admitting testimony at trial under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Fahina and Victim met while she was residing at an extended stay hotel in South Salt Lake City. They began a sexual relationship that lasted for about a month and a half, during which time Fahina would stay overnight in Victim’s room three or four nights a week. Fahina also kept some…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PinderUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HackfordUtah Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Leland SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017