Legal Opinion

Queen v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 11, 2006No. 03-06-00020-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.

Appellant Odis Queen was indicted under three cause numbers for three counts of indecency with a child by contact and one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Queen’s attorney requested a psy chological evaluation, arguing that Queen might be incompetent to stand trial. Dr. Richard Coons and Dr. George Parker evaluated Queen and both determined that he was mentally retarded and incompetent to stand trial and would not regain competency in the future.

On December 29, 2005, the trial court held a hearing at which it considered the doctors’s reports and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alt, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  2. Evans v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Price, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  2. Reinke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  3. Alice Vega Fiala v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2017
  4. Brad William Reinke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  5. Brad William Reinke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API