Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Steven D.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 29, 2011No. 2009-62-AppealPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SUTTELL, C.J.,

with whom GOLDBERG, J., joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Because we believe there is ample evidence in the record to support the trial justice’s decision to terminate Kathleen’s parental rights, we respectfully dissent. This Court often has explained that the Department of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF) is not required to “hold[ ] the hand of a recalcitrant parent.” In re Joseph S., 788 A.2d 475, 478 (R.I.2002) (quoting In re Kristen B., 558 A.2d 200, 204 (R.I.1989)). Today’s holding, however, in effect, requires DCYF not only to hold the hand of an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Kristen B.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  2. In Re Christopher B.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  3. In Re Natalya C.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  4. In Re Alexis L.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  5. In Re Jose Luis R.H.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API